- From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:09:50 -0500
- To: "Robie, Jonathan" <jonathan.robie@emc.com>, "public-xsl-query@w3.org" <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
On 16-02-09 11:09 AM, Robie, Jonathan wrote: > Would you like to suggest wording? I don't think there should be a sentence of the form "If F is a partially applied function ..." in section 3.1.5.1. (At least, not normatively. I can see it might be useful in a note.) Part of the intent of the function-related rewrite in 2011 was that the function invocation rules should work whether F happens to be a PAF or not. I think they've worked in the case where F's implementation is a FunctionBody. In the non-FB case, I believe there is a bug (where the rules don't "just work" for PAFs), but I don't think the current approach is fixing it; rather, it seems to be creating opportunities for more bugs. -Michael
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 21:10:20 UTC