- From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:08:26 -0500
- To: "Robie, Jonathan" <jonathan.robie@emc.com>, "public-xsl-query@w3.org" <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
On 16-02-09 10:47 AM, Robie, Jonathan wrote: > The implementation of F may well be an external function or any other > kind of function. You're (once again) asserting that the implementation of a function can be a function, which is not supported (or not encouraged) by the data model. > The other bullet points say what it means to evaluate each kind of > function. What else would you like this to say? If the implementation of a partially applied function is a FunctionBody, then we can specify the semantics of its invocation in exactly as much detail as we do for a user-defined function. The proposed text does not. > Instead of "supplying the value of each fixed position as the argument of > the corresponding parameter", I think it should say "supplying the value > of each non-local variable binding as the argument of the corresponding > parameter." Would that fix the problem? No, "the corresponding parameter" doesn't mean anything in that sentence. -Michael
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 16:08:58 UTC