- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:51:55 -0600
- To: public-xsl-query@w3.org
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
The XSL WG met for 90 minutes on Thursday, 07 April 2016. Much of the call was devoted to administrative and planning issues. The following notes reflect the discussion of technical issues during the call. > 1 Roll call - Need manual roll call Sharon Adler (chair) Anders Berglund Carine Bournez (W3C Staff) Abel Braaksma Luis Ibhiabor (University of Oxford) Michael Kay Michael Sperberg-McQueen Norman Walsh (MarkLogic) Regrets from Charles Foster. > 2 Assign minute-taker - volunteers? MSM took these minutes. > 7. Spec bugs > 10 Open Bugs as of 6 April 2016 - 6:00pm EDT > 29558 [xslt30] Incorrect namespace for JSON Tue 10:07 Straightforward. > 29550 [XSLT30] typo in Note in 3.11.1 Locating Stylesheet Modules Fri > 13:41 > Editorial - no discussion necessary > 29513 [XSL30] Definition of "potentially consuming" in Glossary not > complete Thu 21:58 > Editorial - no discussion necessary This is technical editorial work; no discussion needed. > 29507 [xslt30] A problem case for streamed grouping 2016-03-10 We discussed the issue. There was some discussion of whether there is a problem here or not: since the nodes in $extra and the nodes in /BOOKLIST/BOOKS/ITEM will be in different documents; the expression ($extra, /BOOKLIST/BOOKS/ITEM) does not need to sort them, since the order of documents is implementation-varying. But ($extra, /BOOKLIST/BOOKS/ITEM)/PRICE and (/BOOKLIST/BOOKS/ITEM, $extra)/PRICE need to be in the same order. (There was some uncertainty whether both of these can in fact occur in the same stylesheet, but two expressions each of which involve nodes from the same two streaming and non-streaming documents can occur.) MSM asked why the comma operator should be interpreted as returning things in document order; here, the key is that the expression using the comma operator is striding. After discussion, we agreed to accept the proposal in comment 3. RESOLVED: to resolve bug 29507 by accepting the proposal in comment 3. At this point, the time for the call expired and we adjourned. ******************************************** C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com http://www.blackmesatech.com ********************************************
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 17:52:23 UTC