Re: completed action A-617-02 (add string templates to grammar)

On 15-09-26 02:45 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
> There had been a suggestion that the name StringConstructor was too
> easily confused with the xs:string constructor function.

Ah. (I saw that "StringConstructor" had been used for a few messages on Sept 
10, but didn't see any mention of why it was abandoned.)

-Michael

Received on Sunday, 27 September 2015 03:15:33 UTC