- From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:34:49 -0400
- To: "Robie, Jonathan" <jonathan.robie@emc.com>
- Cc: Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
2015-09-23 12:18, Florent Georges wrote: > Hi, > > I think {{ ... }} are used quite a lot in other languages, A search in the 9,600 JavaScript files on my local computer found 456 >>> (it's a JavaScript operator along with <<< and ===) 6 ]>> (array reference followed by bitshift operator) 0 }>> 27 }> (Josh found this more common on symbolhound) 213 ]> (e.g. array ref followed by comparison) 24 "]> (e.g. constructing an MSIE HTML "if" as a string) 1257 }} (e.g. almost any use of jQuery will contain this) 213 ]> (e.g. constructing a CDATA section by string manipulation) 0 }@@ 0 ]@@ Josh found 7 @@{ results on symbolhound; four of these were mail messages from someone writing a preprocessor that used @@{....}; looks like it's playframework.org, which is the subject of the other 3 matches on symbolhound. There were no matches for }@@ or ]@@ which is what matters for us. So of the ones "not likely to be included accidentally", @@{...]@@ and @@{...}@@ passes the "highly visible" test. <<[...]>> and <<{....}>> fail "highly visible" in an XQuery context but might be OK in the middle of Jav aScript and JSON and CSS. {{...}} won't fly at all, neither will <[...]> The importance of "highly visible" is increased if you take e.g. 200 lines of CSS with substitution, immediately followed by another 100 lines of CSS with substitution, followed by 300 lines of JSON, and want to check the boundaries between them. It's not important with the one to three line examples we've been using on the list, but you could use concat() just as well for those. I could live with either <<[...]>> <<{...}>> or @@. A possible advantage of << is that Perl (and bash) uses it: my $css = <<EOF; @page normal { width: 11in; } EOF (where EOF is any word, single-quoted to inhibit interpolation). Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead; Digital publishing; HTML Accessibility
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 18:34:52 UTC