- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:37:06 -0000
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
minutes from today's telcon are now available here: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/8/2/19-databinding-minutes.html and copied below for your convenience: - DRAFT - XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference 19 Feb 2008 See also: IRC log Attendees Present Jon Calladine (BT) George Cowe (Origo Services Limited) Paul Downey (BT) Regrets Chair pauld Scribe pauld Contents * Topics 1. Administriva 2. Missing Examples? 3. Collection 4. Test Suite 5. Meeting * Summary of Action Items ____________________________________________________________________________ Administriva minutes from the last telcon approved Missing Examples? Jonc: we're down to the last 17 patterns <JonC> List of patterns without example: AttributeFormQualified pauld: I felt that as far as Basic was concerned, we're done! gcowe: I've been checking and putting them into CVS on Jon's behalf pauld: how do we know which ones we can't write examples for? jonc: formqualified is hard one to hit <JonC> AttributeFormQualified,ComplexTypeAnyAttribute, ElementFormUnqualified, ExtendedSequenceLaxAny, ExtendedSequenceLaxOther, ExtendedSequenceSkipAny ExtendedSequenceSkipOther ExtendedSequenceStrictAny ExtendedSequenceStrictOther ExtendedSimpleContent MixedComplexContent QualifiedLocalAttributes SequenceAnyStrict SimpleContentAnyAttribute UnionSimpleAndMemberTypes UnionSimpleTypes UnqualifiedLocalElements pauld: unqualified we can probably ignore, except I know the WSDL 2.0 test suite used them. Nobody in the wild does, and they're not BP gcowe: we can't really prove unqualified elements, without adding a default namespace pauld: unless the default namespace is "" it's not a valid test ... at this point, I'm not worried about running the tests, but good examples in 6/09 would be, er, good <JonC> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/patterns/6/09/AttributeReferenceUnqualified / this example looks easy to write an example for? pauld: can't we add a flag to an example to fill in a default namespace <scribe> ACTION: pdowney to enhance the explode_examples.xsl to add a default namespace [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-128 - Enhance the explode_examples.xsl to add a default namespace [on Paul Downey - due 2008-02-26]. if it's elementFormDefault="unqualified" (the default), then you need a flag to switch that off in the generated WSDL/Schemas. pauld: I'll have a think about supporting these and other xs:schema attibutes jonc: last issue is the ExtendedSequence etc ... exploding into lots of separate patterns pauld: how do we know when we're done? ... want to be driven by the collection jonc: I'm prepared to do the work pauld: at this stage we'll accept patterns, so long as they don't make "Basic" "Advanced" ... i.e don't bu993r it up :) gcowe: gday, gyear, gmonth, are simple, but don't involve timezones jonc: it's all paul's fault - wanted to keep it simple as possible! pauld: *dunk* gcowe: .NET and others have issues for non-timezone instances <JonC> G pattern <xs:pattern value="--10|--11|--12"/> pauld: does timezone qualified make sense here? gcowe: yeah, looks fine as we are pauld: thanks so much for all this work! Collection pauld: I'm still working on the collection, in particular annotating the schema with patterns detected. turns out to be computing intensive. ... will continue to work on this http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/collection/ we hope to use this to drive patterns http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/collection/collection.xml http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=definitions+filetype%3Awsdl&btnG=Google+Sear ch http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=+filetype%3Axsd&btnG=Search pauld: some sites, you have to sign up, in which case I've taken a snapshot, but that's member-visible jonc: I see lots of pendings in the report pauld: jonc, you need to push me to work on the collection! gcowe: is the collection report upto date? pauld: rebuilding, now .. ... ah, Origo are all Advanced! cool! jonc: list looking good gcowe: will add some more Origo schemas pauld: if you know of other schemas, let us know! Test Suite gcowe: not been running it, waiting until we clear the missing examples list pauld: sounds absolutely fine! Meeting pauld: not planning on meeting F2F again. sounds fine? next telcon in three weeks time Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: pdowney to enhance the explode_examples.xsl to add a default namespace [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 17:37:20 UTC