- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:09:27 +0100
- To: "Ed Day" <edday@obj-sys.com>, "George Cowe" <gcowe@origoservices.com>
- Cc: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
----- Original Message From: "Ed Day" <edday@obj-sys.com> >> The only thing I have issue with is the float one. >> 1267.43233765876583765E12 is also a legal literal for a float, but that >> doesn't mean that it can be fully represented in a float variable, and >> thus not round-trippable. > > Many data binding tools provide a way to configure the native language > type that is used to hold a given data item. In this case, the type to > hold this item can be configured to be a string which would allow the item > to be round-tripped. Hi Ed, That's true, but I don't think that's in the spirit of the tests. The original test could be more honestly passed by setting the mapped type to a double, but even that seems against the spirit of the test to me. Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Codalogic Ltd for XML Schema to C++ data binding visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ =============================================
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 14:13:26 UTC