- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:36:24 +0100
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
Hi Paul, I haven't looked at the document yet, but as this is referencing XSD 1.1 and (I think) we are working with XSD 1.0 I'm not sure how useful this document will be to us. I haven't looked into XSD 1.1 much yet either, but my understanding is that it relaxes some of the UPAC restraints with regard to wildcards, and this will make versioning much easier than with XSD 1.0. Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) ============================================= ----- Original Message ----- From: <paul.downey@bt.com> To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:33 PM Subject: Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1 Dear WG, The XML Schema WG have published a WG note: "Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1" [1]. This follows the "XML Schema Versioning Use Cases" WG note [2]. I propose we should conduct a formal WG review of this seemingly useful document and ensure that the concrete schema examples within are covered by our patterns documents. Furthermore this may be a document we can reference and is likely to assist greatly in addressing our charter requirement to consider patterns for versioning. Paul [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema-guide2versioning-20060928/ [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xsd-versioning-use-cases/
Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 08:36:49 UTC