- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:17:49 +0100
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
minutes from today's call are now available: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html and below for tracker's searching [1]W3C - DRAFT - Databinding WG Teleconference 19 Sep 2006 [2]Agenda See also: [3]IRC log Attendees Present Jon Calladine (BT) George Cowe (Origo) Paul Downey (BT) Otu Ekanem (BT) Yves Lafon (W3C) Regrets Chair pauld Scribe pauld Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Administrivia 2. [6]ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names 3. [7]ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema 4. [8]ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace 5. [9]ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution 6. [10]ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern * [11]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________________ Administrivia minutes from last week approved F2F planning - suggested hotel is full Jonc: have to drop off at 15:30 George sends regrets for next week's call chair: let's go to ISSUE-10 and skip next week, then ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names Jonc: presents background on rationalle for his text modified proposal from Jonc: [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep /0023.html pauld: where would this text go? jonc: you've pushed for maybe a primer or annotated companion to the document, not necessarily in our spec? pauld: less text may mean less comments, otoh good text may stave people making comments. This issue is contentious enough to get them anyway. pauld: so we've three proposals, and there are two parts: the normative constriction and the explanatory text. jonc: my latest proposal replaces the first one jonc: i'm ok with the constriction yves: mostly ok with constriction, but would also like to see the rational as non-normative text george: ok with the constriction yves: you might prefer readability and maintainance as opposed to interoperability, maybe this pattern should be a guideline, not normative? chair: so we're back to it being a "Design Consideration". I'm not hearing consensus. let's park this for a couple of weeks. ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema pauld: still working on the report gcowe: working on the naming convention ... sent paul mail pauld: thanks, we need to move the ant forward, and the two-phase pattern detection ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace pauld: did some testing on this: [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep /0022.html <scribe> ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [on George Cowe - due 2006-09-26]. ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution <pauld> I can pick up ACTION-63 as business as usual ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern pauld: came up with example for Chameleon Include - do we need a separate issue for this? [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep /0021.html Is this a separate pattern, if so I'll open a separate issue for this? gcowe: we discussed making stand-alone schemas before, I can look into this pauld: we also need to double-check we have patterns for all our issues and examples for all our patterns, a script might help here. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([18]CVS log) $Date: 2006/09/19 18:45:16 $ References 1. http://www.w3.org/ 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0020.html 3. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-irc 4. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#agenda 5. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item00 6. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item01 7. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item02 8. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item03 9. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item05 10. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item06 11. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#ActionSummary 12. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0023.html 13. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0022.html 14. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01 15. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0021.html 16. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01 17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm 18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:17:59 UTC