- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:17:49 +0100
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
minutes from today's call are now available:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html
and below for tracker's searching
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
Databinding WG Teleconference
19 Sep 2006
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Jon Calladine (BT)
George Cowe (Origo)
Paul Downey (BT)
Otu Ekanem (BT)
Yves Lafon (W3C)
Regrets
Chair
pauld
Scribe
pauld
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Administrivia
2. [6]ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names
3. [7]ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant
schema
4. [8]ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace
5. [9]ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution
6. [10]ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern
* [11]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________________
Administrivia
minutes from last week approved
F2F planning - suggested hotel is full
Jonc: have to drop off at 15:30
George sends regrets for next week's call
chair: let's go to ISSUE-10 and skip next week, then
ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names
Jonc: presents background on rationalle for his text
modified proposal from Jonc:
[12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
/0023.html
pauld: where would this text go?
jonc: you've pushed for maybe a primer or annotated companion to the
document, not necessarily in our spec?
pauld: less text may mean less comments, otoh good text may stave
people making comments. This issue is contentious enough to get them
anyway.
pauld: so we've three proposals, and there are two parts: the
normative constriction and the explanatory text.
jonc: my latest proposal replaces the first one
jonc: i'm ok with the constriction
yves: mostly ok with constriction, but would also like to see the
rational as non-normative text
george: ok with the constriction
yves: you might prefer readability and maintainance as opposed to
interoperability, maybe this pattern should be a guideline, not
normative?
chair: so we're back to it being a "Design Consideration". I'm not
hearing consensus. let's park this for a couple of weeks.
ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema
pauld: still working on the report
gcowe: working on the naming convention
... sent paul mail
pauld: thanks, we need to move the ant forward, and the two-phase
pattern detection
ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace
pauld: did some testing on this:
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
/0022.html
<scribe> ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere
[recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere
[on George Cowe - due 2006-09-26].
ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution
<pauld> I can pick up ACTION-63 as business as usual
ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern
pauld: came up with example for Chameleon Include - do we need a
separate issue for this?
[15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
/0021.html
Is this a separate pattern, if so I'll open a separate issue for this?
gcowe: we discussed making stand-alone schemas before, I can look into
this
pauld: we also need to double-check we have patterns for all our
issues and examples for all our patterns, a script might help here.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded
in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.127
([18]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/09/19 18:45:16 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0020.html
3. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item00
6. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item01
7. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item02
8. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item03
9. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#ActionSummary
12. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0023.html
13. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0022.html
14. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01
15. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0021.html
16. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01
17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:17:59 UTC