- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:45:35 +0100
- To: <edday@obj-sys.com>, <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
> Do you plan to raise the issue of the case of names as part > of this? We > have found that it seems more natural for mapping to > programming languages > if type names are in uppercase and element names are in > lowercase. I think > JAXB makes this conversion automatically. I've seen tools impose a language naming convention, such as Java's camelNamesForProperties and PascalNamesForTypes in the generated code, but that's by no means a common convention in other programming languages and shouldn't leak back onto the wire, no? > A frequent problem is when schema authors decide to make > type and element names the same. It requires that > decorations of some sort be applied to the names to keep them > separate. That's a good point. In a way I see this as being similar to the issue of people giving their types or elements names such as "object" or "customer-order" given it's a language specific problem. Paul
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 14:46:25 UTC