- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:23:44 +0100
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
agenda+ Meeting Administrivia
- roll call
- select scribe
- approve minutes:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/3/F2F-databinding-minutes.html
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/3/14-databinding-minutes.html
- participation news
- up and coming F2F Meetings
suggestion of 4-5 May (Nice/London)
- agenda review
agenda+ Issues and Action Items
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/open
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/actions/open
agenda+ Status of Deliverables
Some editing in hand, hope to have a checked
in ahead of the call:
- Roadmap document
- Basic XML Schema patterns for Databinding
- (Advanced XML Schema patterns for Databinding)
- Test Suite
- Identification of Patterns (ISSUE-12)
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/ws-databinding-charter.html#deliverables
agenda+ ISSUE-7: xsi:nil and minOccurs=0
http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/7
Proposal from Jon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Mar/0005
agenda+ ISSUE-3: Mapping Simple Numeric Types with Infinite Value Space
Proposal from pauld:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Mar/0012.html
agenda+ ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names
Awaiting a proposal from pauld
agenda+ ISSUE-26: qualified local elements and attributes
New issue from pauld
agenda+ ISSUE-27: targetNamespace and Chameleon schemas
New issue from pauld
agenda+ ISSUE-28: what to do if the programming language does not fully support a data structure
New issue, split from ISSUE-1
agenda+ ISSUE-29: what to do with what to do with uncommon data structures in programming languages
New issue, split from ISSUE-1
agenda+ ISSUE-30: a more distinct list of datatypes covered
New issue, split from ISSUE-1
agenda+ Any Other Business
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 23:29:08 UTC