- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:23:44 +0100
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
agenda+ Meeting Administrivia - roll call - select scribe - approve minutes: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/3/F2F-databinding-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/3/14-databinding-minutes.html - participation news - up and coming F2F Meetings suggestion of 4-5 May (Nice/London) - agenda review agenda+ Issues and Action Items http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/open http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/actions/open agenda+ Status of Deliverables Some editing in hand, hope to have a checked in ahead of the call: - Roadmap document - Basic XML Schema patterns for Databinding - (Advanced XML Schema patterns for Databinding) - Test Suite - Identification of Patterns (ISSUE-12) http://www.w3.org/2005/10/ws-databinding-charter.html#deliverables agenda+ ISSUE-7: xsi:nil and minOccurs=0 http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/7 Proposal from Jon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Mar/0005 agenda+ ISSUE-3: Mapping Simple Numeric Types with Infinite Value Space Proposal from pauld: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Mar/0012.html agenda+ ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names Awaiting a proposal from pauld agenda+ ISSUE-26: qualified local elements and attributes New issue from pauld agenda+ ISSUE-27: targetNamespace and Chameleon schemas New issue from pauld agenda+ ISSUE-28: what to do if the programming language does not fully support a data structure New issue, split from ISSUE-1 agenda+ ISSUE-29: what to do with what to do with uncommon data structures in programming languages New issue, split from ISSUE-1 agenda+ ISSUE-30: a more distinct list of datatypes covered New issue, split from ISSUE-1 agenda+ Any Other Business
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 23:29:08 UTC