- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:30:55 -0000
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
----- Original Message From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
>> RESOLUTION: close ISSUE-23 with advice that tools should support mixed as
>> a DOM node, but YMMV
>
> Mixed is an area where we are weak. But it is an area where we would like
> to do better. Therefore, if this route is taken we would prefer not to be
> limited to dropping to DOM if possible so that we can go beyond that.
>
> Also, are you meaning pure DOM as in the API, or DOM-like? i.e. lots of
> DOM wouldn't be required for this use-case (such as attributes etc). A
> binding tool could potentially do a lot better on the typing of the data
> than DOM typically allows etc.
Actually, you would need the attributes in DOM in this case! Sorry about
that.
But it still would be nice to be able to add extra type info if possible.
(Am I allowed to have an argument with myself?!)
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 13:31:15 UTC