When perfoming the tests I noticed some inconsistencies in the test suite. In some cases a correction could be either using an xs:include or putting the referenced element directly into the schema. I would like to inquire the opinion of the WG whether the test suite should use the xs:include or not. The reason is that the xs:include increases the initial requirements to the implementations. I believe the test examples would not lessen in their capabilities without xs:include's. If the WG agrees with this format I could continue formally testing the schemas/wsdls and provide corrections in that format to this list. Example http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/TargetNamespace/ echoTargetNamespace.wsdl modified: added declaration for the element "targetNamespace" <xs:schema xmlns:ex="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/" targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xs:element name="targetNamespace" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="echoTargetNamespace"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="ex:targetNamespace"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> </xs:schema> Vladislav Bezrukov SAP AG, Walldorf, Germany Tel +49 6227 761383 Email vladislav.bezrukov@sap.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:57 UTC