- From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:28:21 -0700
- To: public-xsd-databinding@w3.org
> Discussion of ISSUE-13 and ISSUE-14 at the F2F in Cannes led to the conclusion > that the processContents values of 'lax' and 'skip' may be problematic to > databinding tools. > > Should ISSUE-20 allow for 'skip' as well as 'lax'? For those who weren't at the f2f...what issues with skip and lax were discussed? pvb
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 16:29:37 UTC