RE: XPath 2.0 and node-set ?

Dear Florent,

>  I just had a look at "Basic XML Schema Patterns for Databinding
> Version 1.0", the WD of the 22 November 2006.  I'm surprised to see
> that expressions are based on XPath 2.0, but that the draft uses the
> XSLT 1.0 terminology (node-set vs/ sequence).
> 
> Is there any reason to that?

Please accept my sincire applogies for taking so long to 
reply to your comment [2]. The Working Group took all of five 
minutes to agree [3] on your suggestion and incorporated the 
XPath 2.0 term "sequence" some time soon after in our 
specification [3].

We trust you are happy with the resolution and thank you
once again, for your comment.

Yours,
Paul, On behalf of the W3C XML Schema Patterns 
for Databinding Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/basic/basic.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding-comments/2006Dec/0000.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/7/2/F2F-databinding-minutes.html#item25