- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:35:20 +0100
- To: <darkman_spam@yahoo.fr>, <public-xsd-databinding-comments@w3.org>
Dear Florent, > I just had a look at "Basic XML Schema Patterns for Databinding > Version 1.0", the WD of the 22 November 2006. I'm surprised to see > that expressions are based on XPath 2.0, but that the draft uses the > XSLT 1.0 terminology (node-set vs/ sequence). > > Is there any reason to that? Please accept my sincire applogies for taking so long to reply to your comment [2]. The Working Group took all of five minutes to agree [3] on your suggestion and incorporated the XPath 2.0 term "sequence" some time soon after in our specification [3]. We trust you are happy with the resolution and thank you once again, for your comment. Yours, Paul, On behalf of the W3C XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/ [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/basic/basic.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding-comments/2006Dec/0000.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/7/2/F2F-databinding-minutes.html#item25
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:36:02 UTC