W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding-comments@w3.org > July 2008

RE: XPath 2.0 and node-set ?

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:35:20 +0100
Message-ID: <EFFE16B1340E654082DCD17D16429533ABA96E@E03MVA3-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <darkman_spam@yahoo.fr>, <public-xsd-databinding-comments@w3.org>

Dear Florent,

>  I just had a look at "Basic XML Schema Patterns for Databinding
> Version 1.0", the WD of the 22 November 2006.  I'm surprised to see
> that expressions are based on XPath 2.0, but that the draft uses the
> XSLT 1.0 terminology (node-set vs/ sequence).
> Is there any reason to that?

Please accept my sincire applogies for taking so long to 
reply to your comment [2]. The Working Group took all of five 
minutes to agree [3] on your suggestion and incorporated the 
XPath 2.0 term "sequence" some time soon after in our 
specification [3].

We trust you are happy with the resolution and thank you
once again, for your comment.

Paul, On behalf of the W3C XML Schema Patterns 
for Databinding Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/basic/basic.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding-comments/2006Dec/0000.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/7/2/F2F-databinding-minutes.html#item25
Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:36:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:43:04 UTC