- From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:39:53 +0000
- To: Wolfgang Hoschek <wolfgang.hoschek@mac.com>
- Cc: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>, public-xqts-comments@w3.org, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>
On Friday 14 July 2006 23:12, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: > What's the rationale for making a 1.0 release if it contains a long > laundry list of known bugs, going back all the way to 0.8.0? (e.g. > many unresolved whitespace issues, as of yesterday). 1.0 will be > interpreted as a call for conformance, and I'd rather not conform to > a buggy test suite. Why not call it 0.9.5? or 1.0-beta1? Personally I think your comment has merit. Labeling it 0.9.5 is a whole different thing compared to 1.0, as outlined. I can't comment on this as whole(because I don't have insight in the full scope, such as the impact of changing the road map and dead lines) so I'll leave this to Andrew for replying. Thanks for asking "why?"! (Personal response.) Frans
Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 23:26:16 UTC