- From: Frans Englich <englich@kde.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:12:48 +0000
- To: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>
- Cc: public-xqts-comments@w3.org
On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:50, Xavier Franc wrote: > Dear XQTS developers, > > There are still many "import schema" declarations in MinimalConformance > tests (around 250, nearly 2%). Yes, it seems to be this one: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2666 > These tests will always fail with an implementation that does not > support Schema: > "If an XQuery implementation does not support the Schema Import Feature, > it MUST raise a static error [err:XQST0009] if it encounters a schema > import." > > IMHO those tests should be moved into the "Optional" part, rather than > be adorned with an "expected-error" clause. > > I am looking forward to seeing this done in the 1.0 version. Unfortunately I must say it's highly unlikely this will be fixed in 1.0. Yes, the issue has been open for long, and I would also very much like to see it fixed. The reason is that we(the test suite task force) have problem getting in contact with all our members. Vacations pokes holes in work flow this time of year. Hopefully, it will be fixed in a bug fix release that has been suggested to follow the 1.0 release. > PS: I intentionally dont add a bug into bugzilla: I am not comfortable > with this tool, and I think it is up to the > XQTS developers to manage the bug database. Furthermore there are > already several reports concerning this topic. You are of course very welcome to use this list. Many find using the bug database practical. Let us know if there's any trouble you have so we can help, if you like. But again, you're welcome to use this list. (Personal response.) Regards, Frans
Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 23:00:10 UTC