- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:01:43 +0000
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xpointer-registry@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Philippe Le Hegaret writes:
> Should we supercede xpath1 and xpath2 as well? It seems to me that those
> two should stay in effect since there might legitimate use for them.
I support the revival of the xpath scheme, and also agree that we
should _not_ supersede xpath1 or xpath2.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFNOEBHkjnJixAXWBoRAj3LAJsESNKv6haNo6rPUePJMDL4/f9qEgCeIpGn
cceNrIvf1vj/z+YkNxYnAxs=
=hSY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 14:02:22 UTC