RE: xpath/xpath1

• From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@Brown.edu>
• Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 19:08:00 -0500
• To: <public-xpointer-registry@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <17343.1632.265876.10561@emt.wwp.brown.edu>

> I would have thought it was sensible to define two schemes:
> xpath1() and xpath2().

I'm convinced. So unless there is any objection, I'll just change the
name of the scheme from xpath() to xpath1() in the TEI Guidelines,
and then submit a modification to my proposal of xpath(). Simon: do
you think your internet-draft is ever going to go further within the
IETF?

Received on Saturday, 7 January 2006 00:08:10 UTC