Re: XML Encryption Syntax and Processing Version 1.1: EXAMPLE 41 from Frederick Hirsch on 2016-04-18 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:06:25 -0400
To: Frank Cornelis <info@e-contract.be>
Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Message-Id: <F9B1A5D3-F8A7-4D2C-9A19-A3A94DAF26FD@fjhirsch.com>

Frank

I just ran a test that indicates you are correct. 

I'm going to propose a CfC for an errata item for this one.

Thanks for pointing it out, apologies for the delay in getting to this.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Chair, XML Security WG

www.fjhirsch.com
@fjhirsch


> On Mar 5, 2016, at 4:56 AM, Frank Cornelis <info@e-contract.be> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> Shouldn't EXAMPLE 41 be:
>    0x59D9BA5E06072C1194091952B01B8360534AB11E
> instead of:
>    0x534C9B8C4ABDCB50038B42015A181711068B08C1
> ?
> 
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Frank.
> 
> -- 
> Frank Cornelis
> e-Contract.be BVBA
> https://www.e-contract.be
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 19:06:58 UTC