- From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org List Public" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:w3c@fjhirsch.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:50 AM > To: public-xmlsec@w3.org List Public > Cc: Frederick Hirsch > Subject: Call for Consensus: Approve Errata for XML Signature 2nd > edition and 1.1 to clarify detached signature wording, please respond > by 30 Sept 2014 > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to add the following errata item to > the errata list for XML Signature (Second Edition) [1] and also for XML > Signature 1.1 [2]. > The same change is applicable to both. The E# will be updated as > appropriate for each. > > Please note that this can be classified as an informative change which > does not affect conformance, as it clarifies wording. > > Please respond to this CfC on the public list by 30 Sept 2014 > indicating support (a +1 will do) or any concern. Silence will be taken > as agreement. > > Errata item to add: > ---- > > E#: Clarify Signature types > > Added: > Accepted: XML Security WG TBD > Class: informative > Affects conformance: no > > (1) Replace "as sibling elements; in this case," with "; that is, " in > Section 2 (Overview). > > (2) Remove " but are sibling elements" from the definition of > "Signature, Detached" in Section 10 (Definitions) > > -- > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair XML Security WG > @fjhirsch > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/ > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-xmldsig-core1-20130411/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 15:30:22 UTC