Re: Comment for XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1 Working Draft 18 October 2012 (re: here() function) from Cantor, Scott on 2012-11-05 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from November 2012)

From: Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:08:26 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "sean.mullan@oracle.com" <sean.mullan@oracle.com>
CC: "edsimon@xmlsec.com" <edsimon@xmlsec.com>, "gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com" <gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BA63CEAE152A7742B854C678D949138339AA277E@CIO-KRC-D1MBX01.osuad.osu.edu>

On 11/5/12 6:19 AM, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com"
<Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

>Does anyone have any concrete suggestions on how to resolve the issue,
>unless we maintain the original resolution which was accepted at the time?

I guess there are two aspects:

- Can existing usage of unqualified here() actually be processed, or was
that just hand-waved around? Or is it just not used and nobody cares?

- For newer applications, you could define a qualified here().

-- Scott

Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 14:09:07 UTC