- From: Bruce Rich <brich@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:04:40 -0600
- To: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, public-xmlsec@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF334771C5.9E387DFC-ON862579B5.006E0BA2-862579B5.006E4DB9@us.ibm.com>
IBM tested against Microsoft's key derivation vectors successfully. Bruce A Rich brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> To: <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org> Date: 02/28/2012 03:07 PM Subject: Key Derivation interop test results We currently have the following on our interop wiki for "XML Encryption 1.1 Key Derivation using ConcatKDF and PBKDF2: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Interop#XML_Encryption_1.1_Key_Derivation_using_ConcatKDF_and_PBKDF2 [[ Test case 1: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret. Key derivation method: ConcatKDF ( http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#ConcatKDF). Test case 2: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret password. Key derivation method: PBKDF2 ( http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#pbkdf2). See test file directory ]] I believe this testing is complete and we can add the following statement to the wiki for these tests: [[ Interop status • Partipants: IBM, Microsoft • Each participant has verified all of these files. ]] Can you please confirm that it is correct and acceptable to add this statement? Do we have any other XML Encryption 1.1 test results? I believe the answer is no. Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair XML Security WG
Received on Friday, 2 March 2012 20:05:38 UTC