- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:54:03 +0000
- To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
This sounds like a bug in the spec - anyone else care to comment? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:18 PM, ext Cantor, Scott wrote: > In the vein of that AES-192 oversight, what is the status of RSA and ECDSA with SHA224? > > I inherited some code that does define a URI constant for RSAw/SHA224, but I don't see it anywhere, so I'm wondering if it was a bug. > > I also noted though that RFC 4051 does define a constant for ECDSA w/ 224, but it's not in the Sig 1.1 draft. Same goes for HMAC with 224 actually. > > And I do see the latter two in the alg cross reference, so I'm thinking bug in Sig 1.1? > > -- Scott > >
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 18:54:39 UTC