- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:39:57 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, w3c@marcosc.com, public-xmlsec@w3.org, tlr@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 09:19:51 Arthur Barstow wrote: > In case it isn't clear, I don't think anyone suggested the ECC stuff > should be "deprecated". On the contrary, I think it makes sense for ECC > to be an algorithm for XMLDigSig1.1. However, some of us have advocated > the syntax be separated from the algorithms. That would permit the > Syntax spec move to REC separately and the algorithm spec(s) could > advance separately (as the market determines the "winner(s)"). This could be a valid conclusion for a PAG BTW Rigo
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 14:47:05 UTC