- From: Shivaram Mysore <shivarammysore@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:30:06 -0800 (PST)
- To: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@oracle.com>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1355265006.51022.YahooMailNeo@web39402.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
+1 -- Strong Authentication, SOA, Web Services, PKI, Software Architecture, Product Strategy and Management Consultants: http://www.TrustStix.com/ http://CloudSecurityProvider.blogspot.com/ ________________________________ From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@oracle.com> To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-xmlsec@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:08 PM Subject: RE: Call for Consensus: progress XML Encryption 1.1 to PR, deferring other normative changes and accepting section 6.1.3 (respond by 11 December) +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:14 AM > To: public-xmlsec@w3.org > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > Subject: Call for Consensus: progress XML Encryption 1.1 to PR, > deferring other normative changes and accepting section 6.1.3 (respond > by 11 December) > > This is a call for consensus (CfC) for the XML Security WG to agree to > progress the 3 December 2012 editors draft of "XML Encryption Syntax > and Processing Version 1.1" to Proposed Recommendation (PR). > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview.html > > This agreement includes the following: > > 1. No new normative features will be added to XML Encryption 1.1, > including the definition of additional key derivation functions or > usage. If the working group is interested such features could be > defined in a separate specification or a subsequent 1.2 update. > > 2. The newly added security considerations section is acceptable to the > WG as written, see section 6.1.3 Backwards Compatibility Attacks in the > editors draft > > 3. The document is stable, all comments have been addressed and interop > has been completed [1]. > > Given agreement on these points I believe we are ready to progress to > Proposed Recommendation. > > Agreeing to this decision means I will request a transition to PR after > 17 December with a planned PR publication on 10 January 2013, assuming > that date works for the W3C Team. As part of publication process I will > update the references (including cross-references to other documents > being published at the same time), as well as prepare a publication > draft that has the PR cover page with the publication date. > > In addition we agree that I will request publication of an update of > the related W3C Note "Functional Explanation of Changes in XML > Encryption 1.1" to add information about the added 6.1.3 security > considerations section. > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core1-explain/Overview.html > > Please respond to this email by next Tuesday 11 December indicating > support (a +1 will do) or any concern. Silence will constitute consent, > but a positive response is preferred. > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair XML Security WG > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-xmlenc-core1-interop-20121113/ > > (note the reason for delaying PR submission until after 17 December is > that there is an Exclusion period that is associated with the previous > XML Encryption 1.1 Last Call which must complete before making the PR > request) > >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:30:36 UTC