Re: Canonical XML error

*That* solves the problem; sorry I hadn't spotted that. I better go fix
my canonicalizer code!

Thanks!

s

On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 17:16 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2011-09-07, at 16:24 +0200, Steve DeRose wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > To include that literal text content, an encoder must "escape" at
> > least one of the 3 characters. Such escaping is obviously possible
> > (if it were not, we would have dealt with it in the XML spec). For
> > example:
> > 
> > 
> >         <p>In XML, the end of a marked section is indicated by
> >         "]]&gt;".</p>
> 
> 
> 
> So, this is a bit hidden, but processing of the string "]]>" when it
> occurs as part of a text node actually is specified and has a
> well-defined processing model:  Canonical XML encodes all ">" signs in
> text nodes as "&gt;".
> 
> 
> See the note about text nodes here:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11/#ProcessingModel
> 
> 
> 
>