- From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:18:35 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- CC: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I am presently not aware of an existing MGF-SHA2 URI, Frederick. -- Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:51 AM > To: Magnus Nystrom > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-xmlsec@w3.org > Subject: Re: Updated XML Encryption 1.1 > > thanks Magnus, response below. All, any problem with removing the text as > Magnus proposes? > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Oct 11, 2011, at 8:07 PM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote: > > > Frederick, > > - I don't follow this text: " (We rely upon the ANY schema construct because it > is not possible to specify element content based on the value of an attribute.)" > > It seems it requires the reader to know how we ended up here. I would suggest > not including it at all. > > I agree, does anyone disagree with removing this language. > > > - I suggest the example for the new OAEP URL use SHA-2 instead of SHA-1 > (both for digest and MGF) to illustrate our desire (and motivation) for making > this addition. > > > > Agree, but first I need to know that URI. See the other email I sent on this. > Please let me know if there is a URI that is already defined, or whether my > proposal is good. > > Thanks > > > -- Magnus > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org > >> [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] > >> On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:20 PM > >> To: public-xmlsec@w3.org > >> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > >> Subject: Updated XML Encryption 1.1 > >> > >> I have updated XML Encryption 1.1 editors draft, see > >> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview.html > >> > >> The changes are as follows: > >> > >> 1. Implemented change proposed on list and agreed on today's call, > >> with additional change to having MGF as element. > >> > >> (Proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > >> xmlsec/2011Oct/0024.html and minutes at > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Oct/att-0032/mi > >> nutes- > >> 2011-10-11.html#item03 ) > >> > >> 2. Updated xenc-schema11.xsd to add MGF element definition. Did *not* > >> add comment to xenc-schema.xsd in EncryptionMethod element to note > >> where this might go as it is described in the text. Thanks to Scott > >> for reviewing and proposing schema improvements. > >> > >> 3. In addition to changes in proposal, in put in 5.5.2 schema snippet > >> MGF defintion, also added second example (one for each URI case). > >> Also changes in proposal to wording to accommodate MGF as an element. > >> > >> 4. Updated the broken RIPEMD-160 reference and fixed some validation > >> errors in the source. > >> > >> Please review sections 3.2, 5.1 (Key Transport algorithm > >> identifiers), 5.5 (removed last paragraph), 5.5.1 (added paragraph > >> break), and 5.5.2 (significant revision of text for RSA-OAEP). > >> > >> Still need to define URL for SHA2 mask generation function > >> (ACTION-845) and update algorithm cross reference (ACTION-846) > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> regards, Frederick > >> > >> Frederick Hirsch > >> Nokia > >> > >> This should complete ACTION-844 > >> > >> > >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 05:19:07 UTC