RE: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800

Yes, I will do that before tomorrow's call.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 7:29 AM
To: Pratik Datta
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-xmlsec@w3.org; cantor.2@osu.edu
Subject: Re: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800

Pratik

Are you going to update section 2.3 of C14N2 to reference XML 1.0/1.1 for definition of whitespace (as well as keeping text you have)?

I'm waiting to close LC-2484 for this update.

http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xml-c14n2-20110421/2484

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:17 PM, ext Cantor, Scott E. wrote:

> On 6/8/11 11:48 AM, "Pratik Datta" <pratik.datta@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> I see that both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 define whitespace in the same way.
>> 
>> S    ::=    (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
>> 
>> 
>> Are you suggesting that we put in a reference to the XML 1.0/1.1
>> specification that defines this whitespace?
> 
> Yes, I'm suggesting that's better than us redefining it here. We could
> non-normatively say what the definition is, but I don't think normatively
> repeating it is a good idea.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
>

Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 16:39:53 UTC