Status of Last Call Tracker Comments

Current Status of Last Call Tracker Comments:

1) XML Signature 1.1

Last Call comments:  

Resolved comments: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-core1-20100204/doc/

Comments during CR:

1a) Open LC-2504, (Editorial)
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/CR-xmldsig-core1-20110303/2504
Add references to Best Practices to Introduction and References

I have updated the draft to address this issue, and requested feedback before 8 August - will close issue at that time unless concern with resolution expressed. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jul/0014.html

1b) Open LC-2502 (substantive)
change RetrievalMethod from SHOULD, KeyInfoReference SHOULD?
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/CR-xmldsig-core1-20110303/2502

Proposal?

Resolved comments, 3 March draft, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/CR-xmldsig-core1-20110303/doc/

2) Signature Properties

2a) LC-2372, resolved but no response from commenter
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-properties-20100204/doc/

3) XML Encryption 1.1

All comments resolved, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmlenc-core1-20100513/doc/

4) Canonical XML 2.0

All comments resolved, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xml-c14n2-20110421/doc/

4) XML Signature 2.0

4 open comments, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-core2-20110421/

4a) LC-4288 , detailed comments from Paul Grosso 

ACTION-810: Pratik Datta to Review and respond to additional XML Core WG comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html

ACTION-802: Pratik Datta to Review comments from XML Core WG and formulate response, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jun/0005.html

(these two actions appear to be duplicates)

4b) LC-2487, change name of attribute from type to Attribute

ACTION-809: Pratik Datta to Fix examples in signature 2.0

4c) LC-2506, KeyValue and KeyInfoReference text

Open, proposed change?

4d) LC-2507, reference Best Practices in intro of XML Signature 2.0

I have updated the draft to address this issue, and requested feedback before 8 August - will close issue at that time unless concern with resolution expressed. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Jul/0015.html

5) XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0

All comments resolved, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-xpath-20110421/doc/

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG

Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 20:21:06 UTC