- From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:15:38 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I agree with Makoto; it would be better to have this attribute be required in the xenc11:AlgorithmIdentifierType. (use="required"). -- Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:03 AM > To: public-xmlsec@w3.org > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > Subject: Fwd: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional? > > [repost to xml security public list] > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org> > > From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> > > Date: August 12, 2011 3:47:27 AM EDT > > To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org> > > Subject: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional? > > > > The attribute Algorithm in complex types AlgorithmIdentifierType and > > PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType in xenc-schema-11.xsd are optional. Is > > this intentional? > > > > -- > > > > Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake > > > > Makoto > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 05:16:09 UTC