- From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:39:26 +0900
- To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
I have to revisit this issue, since a test document gh-example.xml (in the directory "xml encryption test files") has <ds:KeyInfo> <dsig11:ECKeyValue> <dsig11:NamedCurve URI="urn:oid:1.2.840.10045.3.1.7"/> <dsig11:PublicKey>DEADBEEF</dsig11:PublicKey> </dsig11:ECKeyValue> </ds:KeyInfo> To validate this ECKeyValue element, we need the schema for Signature 1.1. But this example document might be simply incorrect. I see other errors such as Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#GenericHybridCipher" which is not a valid algorithm identifer. Is my copy obsolete? Regards, Makoto 2011/8/19 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>: > Agreed. Thanks. > > Regards, > Makoto > > 2011/8/17 <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>: >> >> Dear MURATA Makoto , >> >> The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on >> the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Encryption Syntax and Processing >> Version 1.1 published on 13 May 2010. Thank you for having taken the time >> to review the document and to send us comments! >> >> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. >> >> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at >> public-xmlsec@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 22 August 2011. In >> case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for >> or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot >> be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection >> which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this >> document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. >> >> Thanks, >> >> For the XML Security Working Group, >> Thomas Roessler >> W3C Staff Contact >> >> 1. >> http://www.w3.org/mid/CALvn5EAQnAT-i4xB0HV+29ta0fp=ijcg77BfofM3o1x44U0jQg@mail.gmail.com >> 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xmlenc-core1-20100513/ >> >> >> ===== >> >> Your comment on 9.1 XSD Schema XML Encryption Core Schema Instance >> xenc-sc...: >>> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not import xmldsig11-schema.xsd but >>> rather import xmldsigschema.xsd. However, XML Encryption 1.1 >>> normatively references to XML Signature 1.1 rather than 1.0. >>> Which is correct? >> >> >> Working Group Resolution (LC-2544): >> The working group decided to not make any change here as >> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not require any definitions from >> xmldsig-11-schema.xsd. All that is required is ds:DigestMethod from >> xmldsigschmema.xsd; so the current inclusion is correct and does not >> include unnecessary material. >> >> Thus the schema import is correct as is the normative reference to XML >> SIgnature 1.1 (e.g. to pick up normative changes that are not necessarily >> reflected by schema changes) >> >> >> ---- >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > > Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake > > Makoto > -- Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake Makoto
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2011 01:40:23 UTC