- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:46:57 +0200
- To: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Thanks for that reminder… There's interest (again) in reviving RFC 4051bis, and Don Eastlake actually has indicated interest in taking the pen on it again. I had forgotten about RSA-WHIRLPOOL, and will send him a note about it. So, it's somewhat likely that this will resolve itself. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 2011-08-18, at 16:39 +0200, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > What should we do, if anything, with the RSA-WHIRLPOOL algorithm? > > I was looking at ACTION-238 on Thomas - this relates to the ACTION-222 proposal. > > That proposal suggested documenting the ECDSA-RIPEMD identifier (which we have done in the algorithms cross-reference) > and suggested requiring it instead of ecdsa-sha1. At this point we require ecdsa-sha256 so the reason for requiring this algorithm in XML Signature 1.1 is moot. I suggest no additional change is needed for this algorithm. > > The other proposal is to document the identifier for RSA-WHIRLPOOL, which we have not done. Should we put this in the algorithms cross reference. If so, can someone please make a concrete proposal of changes to that document? > > Please comment on what we should do next so we can close this long standing action. > > Thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair XML Security WG > > --- > > from ACTION-222: > > Proposal: > * ECDSA-RIPEMD Identifier: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#ecdsa-ripemd160 > > #ecdsa-ripemd160 fragment of the new namespace identifies a signature > method processed in the same way as specified by the #ecdsa-sha1 > fragment of this namespace with the exception that RIPEMD160 is used > instead of SHA-1. > > * RSA-WHIRLPOOL Identifier: > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#rsa-whirlpool > > This implies the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding algorithm [RFC3447] as described > in section 2.3.1 but with the ASN.1 BER WHIRLPOOL algorithm > designator prefix. An example of use is > > <SignatureMethod > Algorithm=http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#rsa-whirlpool"/> > > * ECDSA-WHIRLPOOL Identifiers: > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#ecdsa-whirlpool > > The #ecdsa-whirlpool fragment of the new namespace identifies a > signature method processed in the same way as specified by the > #ecdsa-sha512 fragment of this namespace > (http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more) with the exception that > WHIRLPOOL is used instead of SHA-512. > > Konrad Lanz, 10 Mar 2009, 16:39:01 > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 14:47:00 UTC