- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:37:02 +0000
- To: <tlr@w3.org>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Per the discussion on our last teleconference and on the list, I have changed "[XMLENC-CORE1]" to "(XMLENC-CORE1, this document)" in the media type section of XML Encryption 1.1 to avoid generating normative self reference. This should resolve LC-2541 regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:49 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > then go for it > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > > > On 2011-08-16, at 19:11 +0200, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > >> The least work to remove the self reference would be to do what I suggest here. Keeps it fairly easy if you want to reinstall the reference in a stand-alone request later (if you use ReSpec) >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Nokia >> >> >> >> On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:32 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: >> >>> On 2011-08-16, at 17:36 +0200, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thomas, all >>>> >>>> I think it is a very confusing policy to embed a registration document within another document as the references for the two become intermixed and formatting becomes that of the enclosing document etc >>>> >>>> That said, the XML Encryption 1.1 media type section contains many references that are now listed in the references of the enclosing document. I think we should keep it that way to simplify maintenance of references (also that is where you'd expect to find document references as a reader). >>>> >>> >>> It's fine with me to keep the registration's references in the enclosing document. I can fix this effect when the registration request gets submitted. >>> >>>> There are also a number of references to XML Encryption 1.1, the enclosing document. >>>> >>>> Putting each inline and attempting to maintain it would be a mistake. >>> >>>> Thus I think we should go with another approach mentioned on the call today, and change each reference in this section to XML Encryption 1.1 to be the text >>>> "XMLENC-CORE1 (this document)" instead of [XMLENC-CORE1]. This should be clear within the context of the enclosing document and similar to the reference that would be used in a separate media type submission request. No corresponding reference will be included in the list of references. >>> >>> No strong opinion either way on my side — this is the level of detail where I'd be happy to make the decision based on whatever is less work. >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2011 13:38:01 UTC