- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:51:20 +0000
- To: <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- CC: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
It sounds like we need a correction to xenc-schema11.xsd here Does anyone disagree? I have entered this comment as LC-2544, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmlenc-core1-20100513/2544 regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Aug 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > [repost to xml security public list] > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org> >> From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> >> Date: August 12, 2011 4:06:49 AM EDT >> To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org> >> Subject: Importing 1.0 while normatively referencing 1.1 >> >> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not import xmldsig11-schema.xsd but >> rather import xmldsigschema.xsd. However, XML Encryption 1.1 >> normatively references to XML Signature 1.1 rather than 1.0. >> Which is correct? >> >> -- >> >> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake >> >> Makoto >> >> >
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 15:52:02 UTC