Last Call for XML Signature 2.0, Canonical XML 2.0 and XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0

Makoto

The XML Security WG has published Last Call WD documents for XML Security 2.0.

(1) XML Signature 2.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmldsig-core2-20110421/

(2) Canonical XML 2.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xml-c14n2-20110421/

and 

(3) the XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0., http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmldsig-xpath-20110421/

The XML Security WG is looking for review comments before 31 May (to be sent to the public mailing list, public-xmlsec@w3.org )

This is a request for you to please share these documents for review in your ePub community and share any feedback you may have.

Review of the 2.0 requirements,  RELAX NG Schema and Algorithms Cross-Reference documents noted below are  also welcome - I believe you may plan to provide additional RELAX NG feedback.

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG

For tracker, this should complete ACTION-790.


> From: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
> Date: April 26, 2011 7:21:57 PM EDT
> To: "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
> Cc: Roessler Thomas <tlr@w3.org>
> Subject: Last Call for XML Signature 2.0, Canonical XML 2.0 and XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0
> 
> This is a Last Call transition announcement for "XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0" [1],  "Canonical XML Version 2.0" [2], and " XML Signature Streaming Profile of XPath 1.0" [3].
> 
> Please send comments to public-xmlsec@w3.org with [XML Security 2.0 Comment] at the start of the subject line ****before 31 May 2011****.
> 
> Note that comment on the decision to restrict the XPath Profile to XPath 1.0 would be appreciated.
> 
> The Last Call decision was made on 29 March 2011 [4] with agreement on  Last Call duration on 12 April 2011 [5].
> 
> We would especially appreciate feedback from:
> 
> - XML Core WG [6]
> - XSL WG [7]
> 
> No formal objections have been filed against these documents.
> 
> See http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42458/status for WG status page in IPP, and http://www.w3.org/2011/02/09-xmlsec-status.html for additional IPR status information that is relevant to both XML Signature 1.1 and XML Signature 2.0.
> 
> The WG also published updates of ordinary working drafts of the "XML Security Algorithms Cross-Reference" [8], "XML Security 2.0 Requirements and Design Considerations" [9], and "XML Security RELAX NG Schemas" [10].
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair XML Security WG
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmldsig-core2-20110421/
> 
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xml-c14n2-20110421 
> 
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmldsig-xpath-20110421/
> 
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Mar/att-0028/minutes-2011-03-29.html#item04
> 
> [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Apr/att-0026/minutes-2011-04-12.html#item04
> 
> [6] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> 
> [7] http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/
> 
> [8] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmlsec-algorithms-20110421/
> 
> [9] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmlsec-reqs2-20110421/
> 
> [10] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xmlsec-rngschema-20110421
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 18:47:20 UTC