RE: Canonical XML 2.0 Conformance Profiles

> We are treading a fine line here.  If we mark too many features as MUST
> implement, we won't get many implementations, on the other hand if we have
> too many OPTIONAL features nobody will implement them and they will fall
> into the sidelines.

I think we probably have to wait on conformance discussions until we can get
feedback from potential implementers about what's likely to be painful or
uninteresting.

-- Scott

Received on Friday, 3 September 2010 19:05:23 UTC