XML Signature Properties Last Call Issue Resolution

Juan Carlos

I believe the changes referenced below addressed your concerns regarding the XML Signature Properties draft.

It would be helpful if you could please confirm that you agree.

Thanks!

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG



Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
> Date: February 22, 2010 1:23:11 PM EST
> To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
> Cc: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
> Subject: Editorial Update: XML Signature Properties
> 
> I have updated the XML Signature Properties editors draft [1] to  
> incorporate the changes agreed at the 16 February teleconference [2],  
> to address the Last Call comments from Juan Carlos.  This should close  
> ACTION-524.
> 
> The changes include an additional sentence at the end of the abstract,  
> a new paragraph at the end of the introduction, and an informative  
> reference to XAdES.
> 
> I also updated the second paragraph of the introduction since it used  
> the incorrect tense (would instead of is).
> 
> Please review. Juan Carlos, please indicate if this addresses your  
> concern as agreed. If you do not respond I assume that the Last Call  
> comment has been resolved.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-properties/Overview.html
> 
> [2] original proposal:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Feb/0022.html
> 
> change agreed at teleconference:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-xmlsec-minutes.html#item04

Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 21:57:04 UTC