- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:59:17 +0200
- To: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Here are the various items we have so far related to XML Security 2.0 performance (focus on canonicalization and signature): thesis re C14N 2.0 parameters http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Oct/0038.html (Meiko) Raul Benito Garcia thesis (in Spanish that I do not read) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Nov/0046.html (thesis via Sean) argument for constraining http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/performance/c14n-subtree/constrained-cases-description.pdf (constrained cases, Pratik) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Apr/0045.html Canonicalization measurements http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009May/0003.html (Pratik) probably not relevant to our analysis of 2.0 improvements, Alternative algorithms (MQQ) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Nov/0047.html (Chris) Is anyone aware of any other performance material that is relevant to showing how XML Security 2.0 addresses the performance issues in 1.1? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 17:59:59 UTC