- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:02:00 +0200
- To: <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 17 October 2010 13:02:45 UTC
Yes I had added it to 1.1. From your message I assume we now have consistent drafts. I agree we should update the example in 4.5.4 in both drafts - are you able to do this? Perhaps it is my local environment but it looks like the ReSpec formatting of the table of contents is incorrect, using bullets inappropriately. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:53 PM, ext Pratik Datta wrote: I noticed that X509Digest was already added to Dsig 1.1, I made exactly the same changes in Dsig 2.0 http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-20/#sec-X509Data Version: Oct 16 2010 We could consider adding the new dsig11:X509Digest element to the example in section 4.5.4 Pratik
Received on Sunday, 17 October 2010 13:02:45 UTC