Re: New element definition added to 1.1 XML Signature Schema

Frederick,

You are very right.

> Why is dsig11_X509Digest treated  differently than dsig11_OCSPResponse ?

No reasons.

> should we have 
> 
> ds_X509DataForeignChild |= ddsig11_OCSPResponse
> 
> ds_X509DataForeignChild |= dsig11_X509Digest

Yes.  Please get rid of 

> ds_X509DataChild |= dsig11_OCSPResponse

and

> ds_X509DataChild |= dsig11_X509Digest

Note: EPUB3 is likely to use your 1.1.

Cheers,
Makoto

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 12:46:11 UTC