ISSUE-218: For canonical xml 2.0 is eliminating inclusive c14n an issue for xml:base etc (which use cases are impacted), and should QName aware be mandatory

• From: XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
• Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:52:42 +0000
• To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
• Message-Id: <E1PINpq-0002UO-Oh@lowblow.w3.org>

ISSUE-218: For canonical xml 2.0 is eliminating inclusive c14n an issue for xml:base etc (which use cases are impacted), and should QName aware be mandatory

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/218

Raised by: 
On product: 

Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 15:52:45 UTC