- From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:20:45 +0900
- To: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> > I think that's intentional, the use of any is more consistent with the > approaches taken in XML Signature for open content models. Open means open. The choice of specific elements in the ns "http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#" and <any namespace="##other"/> would mean more sense. I would argue that <any namespace="##any"> is always bad, since something unnecessary will be allowed and the programmer will not consider such sick cases such as: <KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm=""> <DerivedKey> <KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm=""/> <KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm=""/> <ConcatKDFParams>...</ConcatKDFParams> </KeyDerivationMethod> </KeyDerivationMethod> </DerivedKey> </KeyDerivationMethod> Cheers, Makoto
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 22:21:18 UTC