- From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:20:45 +0900
- To: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
>
> I think that's intentional, the use of any is more consistent with the
> approaches taken in XML Signature for open content models. Open means open.
The choice of specific elements in the ns "http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#" and
<any namespace="##other"/> would mean more sense.
I would argue that <any namespace="##any"> is always bad, since
something unnecessary will be allowed and the programmer will not
consider such sick cases such as:
<KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm="">
<DerivedKey>
<KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm=""/>
<KeyDerivationMethod Algorithm=""/>
<ConcatKDFParams>...</ConcatKDFParams>
</KeyDerivationMethod>
</KeyDerivationMethod>
</DerivedKey>
</KeyDerivationMethod>
Cheers,
Makoto
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 22:21:18 UTC