RE: Regarding ACTION-528 (ISSUE-188)

Yes, looks good.

-- Magnus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@Nokia.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:01 AM
> To: Magnus Nystrom
> Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Makoto MURATA; XMLSec WG Public List (public-
> xmlsec@w3.org)
> Subject: Re: Regarding ACTION-528 (ISSUE-188)
> 
> I have just updated XML Encryption to fix the link to the 1.1 schema.
> Can you please confirm I got this right?
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:09 AM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> > This is in response to ACTION-528 that was assigned to me during this
> > week's call.
> >
> > I reviewed the latest XML DSig draft and the latest XML Enc draft. I
> > am not sure when the text in Section 4.5.8 of XML DSig 1.1 got added,
> > but it is, as Frederick noticed, clearly not correct. I suggest a
> > change to:
> >
> > "
> > 4.5.8 XML Encryption EncryptedKey and DerivedKey Elements The
> > <xenc:EncryptedKey> and <xenc11:DerivedKey> elements defined in
> > [XMLENC-CORE1] as children ofds:KeyInfo can be used to convey in- band
> > encrypted or derived key material. In particular, the
> > <xenc:DerivedKey> element may be present when the key used in
> > calculating a Message Authentication Code is derived from a shared
> > secret.
> > "
> >
> > Also, I noted that the current draft of XML Enc 1.1 (at
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/)
> > does not link to the 1.1 schema (of which I found one copy at:
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-schema-11.xsd
> > ) , but rather twice to the 1.0 schema (at
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-schema.xsd)
> >
> > -- Magnus
> >
>

Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 16:02:41 UTC