Editorial update: XML Signature 1.1

Thomas made some additional edits to fix various validation issues and  
remove the RFC2231 reference in the wrong place.

I added the RFC 2231 reference to signature where Cynthia suggested,  
we can agree whether to remove it on today's call.

I also made another pass through the references to fix some purely  
editorial issues:

> Put names first for consistency in OCSP, RANDOM, RFC4949, SAX and  
> XML-Japanese. Add link
> and citation to title in IEEE1363 and fix for complete title in SECG1.

Any changes needed to acknowledgements for XML Signature 1.1 or  
Signature Properties?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG

Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:19:33 UTC