Saturday, 30 January 2010
Friday, 29 January 2010
- XML Security RNG Schemas and WG1 review
- Editorial update: XML Security RNG Schemas
- Re: ISSUE-186: What is the normative content of section 5.4.2? (PBKDF2) [Enc11 (XML Encryption 1.1)]
- RE: ISSUE-186: What is the normative content of section 5.4.2? (PBKDF2) [Enc11 (XML Encryption 1.1)]
Thursday, 28 January 2010
- RE: Updated XML Encryption 1.1 Editor's Draft
- Re: Algorithm xref -- propose to defer publication
- Editorial update: 2.0 Requirements, RNG schemas
- Re: xmlsec minutes page
- ISSUE-186: What is the normative content of section 5.4.2? (PBKDF2) [Enc11 (XML Encryption 1.1)]
- xmlsec minutes page
- Algorithm xref -- propose to defer publication
- Editorial update - XML Signature 2.0
- Re: Editorial Update: Moved RNG schema materials Standalone RNC Schema Note
- removing email references from Requirements 2.0
Wednesday, 27 January 2010
- Editorial update: XML Security 2.0 requirements, XML Security RNG Schema
- For review: LC-ready draft for Signature 1.1
- RE: Signature 1.1: CharTwoFieldParamsType (Re: ACTION-492: Compare XML Schema fragments and file)
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
- Signature 1.1: CharTwoFieldParamsType (Re: ACTION-492: Compare XML Schema fragments and file)
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Editorial update: XML Signature 1.1 explain document
Monday, 25 January 2010
- Updated XML Encryption 1.1 Editor's Draft
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-01-26
- ISSUE-184: Add reference to RNG Schema document [Generic Hybrid Ciphers]
- Call for Consensus: Publish Last Call of XML Signature 1.1 and XML Signature Properties
- Editorial Update: Moved RNG schema materials Standalone RNC Schema Note
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
Sunday, 24 January 2010
Saturday, 23 January 2010
Friday, 22 January 2010
Thursday, 21 January 2010
- RE: ACTION-434: Propose final disposition of Referencing syntax
- RE: ACTION-434: Propose final disposition of Referencing syntax
- Next steps for XPath profiles in conjunction with XML Security WG?
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
Wednesday, 20 January 2010
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- FYI: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications
- Re: RNG schema plans
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- RE: ACTION-434: Propose final disposition of Referencing syntax
Tuesday, 19 January 2010
- <SignedInfo> canonicalization in XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal
- RE: ACTION-434: Propose final disposition of Referencing syntax
- W3C Minutes for 2010-01-19 meeting
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- RE: RNG schema plans
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-01-19 v3
- Re: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
- Re: RNG schema plans
Monday, 18 January 2010
- [ACTION-453] Review XML Enc v1.1
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-01-19 v2
- Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-01-19
- Editorial update: XML Signature 1.1
- Re: Clarifying XPath Filtering Transform text (pertains to ACTION-350, ACTION-352, and ISSUE-141)
- Re: RNG schema plans
- ISSUE-178: Highlight additional text constraints on XSD schema as such. [Enc11 (XML Encryption 1.1)]
- RNG schema plans
- ISSUE-176: RNG schema for Signature 1.1 depends on xslt.rnc [RelaxNG Schema]
Saturday, 16 January 2010
Friday, 15 January 2010
Thursday, 14 January 2010
- Re: proposed XML Signature 1.1 addition
- Re: proposed XML Signature 1.1 addition
- Re: proposed XML Signature 1.1 addition
- proposed XML Signature 1.1 addition
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Editorial Updates: authoritative schema, informative RNG schema section, SHA-1-Collisions reference
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
- RE: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Editorial update: XML Signature 1.1, XML Encryption 1.1, XML Security 1.1 Requirements
- Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Reference for SHA-1 being broken
- Editorial Update: XML Encryption 1.1
- Re: Pls confirm - text on authoritative schema
- ACTION-492: Compare XML Schema fragments and file
- Pls confirm - text on authoritative schema
- Signature properties example
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2010-01-12 v2
- Re: DSIG Reference Updates
- Editorial update: XML Encryption 1.1
- Editorial update: XML Signature 1.1
- Reverting RFC 2231 change (Re: WWW/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11 Overview.src.html,1.24,1.25 Overview.htm,1.110,1.111)
- Re: DSIG Reference Updates
- Action-441 Part 1
Monday, 11 January 2010
- RE: DSIG Reference Updates
- Editorial Update - XML Signature 1.1
- Re: DSIG Reference Updates
- RE: XML Enc v1.1 Reference Updates
- XML Enc v1.1 Reference Updates
- DSIG Reference Updates
- ISSUE-168: Assorted normative reference updates [Sig11 (XML Signature 1.1)]
- ISSUE-167: Unicode NFC reference [Sig11 (XML Signature 1.1)]
Saturday, 9 January 2010
Friday, 8 January 2010
- On ACTION-451: Review AES-GCM proposal
- Editorial Update: Best Practices note re RFC 3161
- Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Important - please review actions and issues noted in agenda for 12 Jan and note which can be closed.
- Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2010-01-12
- Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Editorial update - XML Signature Best Practices
- Re: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- RE: Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Best Practices review (was Action-441 Completed)
- Editorial Update: Signature Properties
- New Issue and proposal: which is definitive, XSD snippets, standalone XSD or RNG?
- New Issues: RNG Schema needed for Signature Properties, Generic Hybrid Ciphers
Thursday, 7 January 2010
- Re: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
- RE: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
- RE: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties
- Re: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- RE: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- Re: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- Re: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- RE: ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- ISSUE-163, standalone XSD and RNG schema needed for Signature Properties
- FYI: new RSA factoring record (768)
- Subject: Add warnings to Signature 1.1 and 1.1 requirements on SHA-1?