Re: ACTION-638: high level reorg suggestions

Thanks much Scott for your changes, this is a big improvement. Thanks!

I made a few fixes to correct some misplaced </section> elements , a broken link, and some older validation errors. I also went ahead and updated the last paragraph in the introduction (as I suggested earlier) as well as updating the section levels in the examples (you did most of that, I fixed one remaining one).

I tweaked sectioning within "the Reference element" to put URI processing under "The URI Attribute" and transform sections under "The Transforms Element"

Please take a look (possible browser reload needed) to see if the table of contents is still good:

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-20/Overview.html

I think we now have a sensible table of contents, with no more changes needed, so I think you can go ahead with the other changes you were going to work on.

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:41 PM, ext Cantor, Scott E. wrote:

>> I'm not enthusiastic about taking on another big revamp right this second, so
>> if somebody else is willing to take a whack, I would prefer that. In the
>> meantime, I'll try and get the TBD sections I left undone checked in tonight,
>> and we can divvy up next steps tomorrow morning.
> 
> Since it sounds like you're in process of doing some stuff, and since the three TBD sections aren't really that essential to the reorg questions, I'll hold off on this. Just note that the old material referencing the XPath subset draft is intended to be merged into the IncludedXPath/ExcludedXPath definition sections I left as placeholders, rather than standalone text.
> 
> The old section with Pratik's XPath text is in there, but commented out. 
> 
> -- Scott
>

Received on Monday, 6 December 2010 22:12:59 UTC