- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:25:37 +0100
- To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Thanks Scott. I don't remember whether I added the section referencing feature to respec earlier, I'll have to take a look and see if I did, and if not, will look at what is involved. You are correct that it is not good to hard code section numbers that might change. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:09 PM, ext Cantor, Scott E. wrote: > Just an update on my edits, I'm doing a large editorial pass over the dsig-2.0 spec while I make these larger changes; there are a lot of inconsistencies and some section numbering that's off, so it's taking a while. I hope to have it done by next week. > > As an aside, these hardcoded section numbers in references are obviously a problem for maintenance. Is there some way with this format to reference sections by their ID? > > -- Scott > > >
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 17:27:44 UTC