- From: Meiko Jensen <Meiko.Jensen@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
- Date: 3 Dec 2010 15:51:35 +0100
- To: "XMLSec WG Public List" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Regarding my Action-711 I had a look at the latest version of the DSig2.0 draft and noticed that the example documents I created originally (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Sep/0024.html) are not contained. However, I verified both my original versions and the example fragments I found in the draft regarding the use of either QNameAware or IDAttributes. I came to the conclusion that for the given examples both elements are used properly whenever they occur, but since there is no example that really makes explicit use of their intended functionality, there is no real example showing the reader how their use should look like. In other words, there is either no ID or no QName-in-content in the examples. I recommend adding another full example document to the spec, maybe as 2.1.1.2 or 2.4 (weird headline numbering here...). However, I feel that I'm not able to come up with such an example on my own - besides the ones I already drafted in September, see above. I think this should close Action-711 for now, but on the next call we should discuss creating and adding a new, more complete example of 2.0 mode signatures. cheers Meiko -- Dipl.-Inf. Meiko Jensen Chair for Network and Data Security Horst Görtz Institute for IT-Security Ruhr University Bochum, Germany _____________________________ Universitätsstr. 150, Geb. ID 2/411 D-44801 Bochum, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 234 / 32-26796 Telefax: +49 (0) 234 / 32-14347 http:// www.nds.rub.de
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 14:52:02 UTC