- From: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 17:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
I also think we should change the "Element" to maybe "QNElement" or how about "QNameInText" ? I have incorporated these changes(kept it as "Element") into the document. http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/Overview.html (August 7th version). This is my ACTION-611 Pratik -----Original Message----- From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 7:56 AM To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org Subject: RE: ACTION-612: Schema addition to c14n 2 draft for qnameAware parameter > how about using NCName instead of "Name"? I'd rather go with LocalName if we're going to change it like that. NCName is a bit obtuse. > replace "Element" with "QNElement" ? I don't think it matters that much. The schema is a little weird looking, but nobody looks at the schema anyway. -- Scott
Received on Sunday, 8 August 2010 00:02:42 UTC